Building a blockchain Britain in Bloxwich, because ...?

Eddie Hughes, the Tory MP for North Walsall in the West Midlands, seems like a sound guy.

A great guy, even, if his Facebook followers are anything to go by:

Thing is, great guys don’t always have very well thought-out ideas.

Mr Hughes has just written a paper published by FREER — a new initiative from conservative think tank the Institute of Economic Affairs — called “Unlocking Blockchain: Embracing new technologies to drive efficiency and empower the citizen”, which was pitched to us as “ an enthusiastic call for government to embrace the opportunities of blockchain and associated technologies”.

It’s enthusiastic, alright. Here is an excerpt from the paper:

Blockchain and associated technologies offer an unrivalled opportunity to begin to review and redesign the UK’s data systems. Whitehall and public services could be fundamentally rewired to empower citizens and better serve their needs. We should encourage digital entrepreneurship. We must tackle the trust deficit. By introducing a departmental target for blockchain efficiency savings, we can begin to generate a digital dividend to pass on to tax payers or to reinvest. And we can use a mix of classical liberal values and new technologies to strengthen individual freedom and improve the life chances of all. We must harness the energy of entrepreneurial spirit created by these new world-changing technologies to ensure the future is freer. By engaging now, and recognising blockchain’s potential, we can ensure it is used by the state to empower individuals, and to afford us real control over our own data.

A fundamental rewiring of public services. Tackling the trust deficit. A digital dividend. No shortage of buzz phrases here. But there doesn’t seem to be a whole lot of meaning behind them.

You might wonder, as we did, where this blockchain idea came from — Mr Hughes was only voted into parliament for the first time last June, but he previously worked in the construction and housing sectors. So we called him up. Did he have a secret side-project in coding or cryptography? Not so much:

I’m just a Brummie bloke who kept hearing about blockchain, read a bit about it, and thought: this is interesting stuff. So I came up with this idea: blockchain for Bloxwich.

(Bloxwich is one of the two major towns in Mr Hughes’s constituency, which also happens to be one of the poorest Conservative areas in the country. Was there a reason for Bloxwich being a particular target, we asked? Nope, it’s just that “Blockchain for Wals

all North wouldn’t have the same ring to it.” )

Mr Hughes is a refreshingly candid and straight-talking MP. He admitted to not having technological expertise, acknowledged that blockchain might be all just a lot of hype, and even said it was possible he hadn’t really understood it:

Maybe in some ways I have not completely understood what the application could be, but the idea that transactions are more secure, auditable and unchangeable could have applications for my constituents. 

But if he’s not that sure about it, it doesn’t seem like a great idea that he’s just written a 36-page paper on the subject and has written think-pieces to be published today by the Telegraph and Huffington Post. Confusion breeds confusion, and there’s plenty of that already in this space.

Along with the paper, Mr Hughes is making several proposals, including for a “public-facing Chief Blockchain Officer” who could coordinate government work on blockchain across different departments and ministries, and for a “blockchain departmental target”: “a longterm aim for government departments to make a 1 per cent efficiency saving by embracing blockchain and other associated innovative technologies”. (The verb “to embrace” comes up in various forms 14 times in the paper.)

The 1-per-cent efficiency savings sound nice. So where did that figure come from, we asked? Again, we got a pretty honest answer: nowhere particularly rigorous, although “one of the things that would sit behind it would be comparisons to the Estonian model”. (Estonia has reportedly managed to save 2 per cent of its GDP per year in salaries and expenses by digitising its processes, and uses a digital identity system for ID cards called KSI Blockchain which has generated a lot of excitement. But as Attack of the 50-Foot Blockchain author David Gerard has pointed out, this was a rebrand — the KSI system was started in 2007 and also, it doesn’t even use blockchain.)

You can’t really blame Mr Hughes for being what he calls a “crazy bullish enthusiast” about blockchain technology when there is so much literature out there that propagates the idea that this is world-saving technology, without actually explaining how it will work.

Nor is Mr Hughes the only one in government getting excited about blockchain. Fellow Tory MP Grant Shapps was to be found at a blockchain conference in London the week before last delivering a speech called Building a Blockchain Britain. And Theresa May, after Mr Hughes enthused about his blockchain paper at prime minister’s questions, suggested he distribute the paper to all members of parliament.

It’s almost as if politicians didn’t have anything else to worry about.

Related links:
Blockchain insiders tell us why we don’t need blockchain – FT Alphaville

  1. Sports are not markets, predictions ain’t investment
  2. Spot the difference, Steinhoff edition
  3. Larry Robbins, a cautionary tale
  4. Zion Oil: where does the money come from?
  5. The node to serfdom
  6. Carney is down with the crypto kids
  7. Samsonite: inventory, excess baggage, and unresolved questions
  8. It might be a long wait for “the equivalent alternative to ICOs”
  9. Don’t blame it on the sunshine
  10. In corporate America, brands develop you
  11. One in ten dollars of US housing were anonymous
  12. Should AT&T worry more about its debt?
  13. Who cares if Elon is incinerating capital?
  14. Let’s not try make ‘crypto chicks’ a thing
  15. Zion Oil: Living on a prayer
  16. Tokens all the way down
  17. Eight-dimensional chess with Elon Musk
  18. A lopsided trade is a good trade, Italian inflation edition
  19. How to buy Italian fire insurance
  20. Atlas bugged
  21. Inflating inflation
  22. Crypto’s most devout believers are suffering a crisis of faith
  23. Plus500: past performance is no guide to the future
  24. Noble rot in a shrinking Harbour
  25. In defence of ticket touts
  26. Please don’t tell individual investors to buy leveraged loans
  27. RIB Software: the unicorn rainy-day fund
  28. Retail is not dead
  29. Did Soros really give Tesla a “vote of confidence”?
  30. At a crypto conference in New York, it feels like 2017 all over again
  31. Egregious expectations – Intelsat edition
  32. Bitcoin cash is expanding into the void
  33. Stop getting The Flintstones wrong
  34. Bond investors do not care if Argentina is solvent in 100 years
  35. Ubiquiti Networks: of cash and borrowed time
  36. “We’re very disappointed in you, Spotify”
  37. ‘Sex redistribution’ and the means of reproduction
  38. Tesla probably needs to raise capital this year
  39. No entitlement crisis in America
  40. Free cash flow to whom?
  41. Hey crypto bros! Journalism ≠ advertising
  42. Human capital and the jobs guarantee
  43. This is a tech bubble, when’s the crash?
  44. The magic of adjustments: ebitla-dee-da
  45. FUD, inglorious FUD
  46. A complex analysis reaches same conclusion as simple one: hedge funds suck
  47. The jobs guarantee and human-capital “nationalisation”
  48. These hedge fund numbers can’t be right
  49. The Vomiting Camel has escaped from Bitcoin zoo
  50. Lies, damn lies, and charticles
  51. The world doesn’t need more Elon Musks
  52. No, Facebook should not become a nonprofit
  53. Sell all crypto and abandon all blockchain
  54. Immutable ledgers meet European data protection
  55. Amazon is not a bubble
  56. Japan’s economic miracle
  57. Have you ever meta crypto joke you didn’t like?
  58. Delaware should change its rules to let the light in
  59. Who needs the labels anyway?
  60. Baby Boomers want your family to finance a larger share of their retirement
  61. No, America would not benefit from authoritarian central planning
  62. No one needs to buy Tesla
  63. How to win a debate in the cult of meritocracy
  64. Steinhoff International and the case of Pepkor Global Sourcing
  65. Sorry Jack, Bitcoin will not become the global currency
  66. The “academic’s cryptocurrency” is an elegant waste of time
  67. Cigarettes are the vice America needs
  68. Well that’s one reason to buy yen…
  69. Musicians, don’t just blame the labels for your lack of dough
  70. Giving stock away to staff doesn’t absolve share buybacks
  71. A penny for Macpherson’s thoughts on the nominal anchor
  72. Monopoly and its discontents
  73. A State of Mind
  74. America is not the least protectionist country in the world
  75. This is nuts, when does Netflix crash?
  76. No Bloomberg, the world’s richest people did not lose $114bn…
  77. Someone is wrong on the internet, government employee pensions and passive investing edition
  78. Someone is wrong on the internet, possibly fragile
  79. Someone is wrong on the internet, consumer financial regulation edition
  80. Someone is wrong on the internet: tontine tokens [Update]
  81. Someone is wrong on the internet, road economics edition
  82. Someone is wrong on the internet, wages and the stock market edition

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2018. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don’t cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

(Excerpt) Read more Here | 2018-07-04 04:13:51
Image credit: source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.